Home » climate and security » Kyrgyzstan: Climate Change, Water and Regional Security

Kyrgyzstan: Climate Change, Water and Regional Security

The nation of Kyrgyzstan is a place of geopolitical importance, a provider of critical water resources for the Central Asian region, and a highly unstable place. It also sits in a neighborhood of mistrust, enjoying especially strained relations with Uzbekistan to the southwest, and existing in close proximity to large unstable nations to the east, such as Afghanistan. The effects of a changing climate, which are likely to impact the country’s and the region’s vital water resources, should thus be a matter for serious global and regional attention.

Strategic significance
For the United States and its NATO allies, Kyrgyzstan has been a key transit center for supplies and personnel on the way to Afghanistan, housing the important Manas Air Base. Russia also has an air base in the country, maintaining its physical ties to the former Soviet state. The country is a natural stop along the old Silk Road trading route, which is in the process of being revived in modern form by China and Turkey – two key powers that essentially bookend the entire region from the east and west. On a regional scale, Kyrgyzstan hosts the headwaters of many of Central Asia’s major transboundary rivers, making it a critical source of fresh water for a number of neighboring countries.

Climate Change in Kyrgyzstan and Central Asia
Climate change complicates an already complicated situation. As highlighted by a recent article in Eurasia Review, the projected impacts of climate change on the country may have serious regional implications. For example, the afore-mentioned headwaters of many of the area’s transboundary rivers, which relate to no less than eight major hydrological basins in the region, are largely fed by huge glaciers and extensive snow cover in Kyrgyzstan. Any danger to these glaciers and snow cover could severely impact water, food and energy security across a large swathe of Central Asia. Unfortunately, that danger already exists. As stated in a recent UNDP report:
…the country’s immense glaciers and snow cover represent a strategic resource for all countries of the region. Yet, this resource is most vulnerable to global warming effects. Shrinking of glaciers and high mountain’s snow surfaces is resulting in water shortages and will potentially lead to problems with agriculture, water sharing and energy in the region
This assessment is consistent with climate change projections for Central Asia as a whole. While instability, capacity gaps in the region, and a diverse distribution of climates within Kyrgyzstan have made it a difficult place in which to gather localized climate data (it is a relatively data-poor spot, compared to other areas of the world), there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the effects may be significant, particularly in relation to water. These effects may have serious implications for resource security in Central Asia, which in turn will introduce uncertainties and stresses to the regional priorities and ambitions of many major powers.

Next Steps

The geopolitical significance of Kyrgyzstan, the instability of the country and its immediate neighbors, its central role in providing water resources for Central Asia, and the projected impacts of climate change on those water resources, merit close attention. These dynamics must be understood quickly in order to ensure that adequate plans are in place to mitigate and adapt to any future resource security breakdowns in the country, and the broader region. Helping Kyrgyzstan and other nations in the area build their capacity to prepare for and adapt to climate change may play a key role in forging a more resilient and secure Central Asia.

2 Comments

  1. [...] of the region, is especially worrying, given the potential regional security implications. As we noted in a blog this past May: For the United States and its NATO allies, Kyrgyzstan has been a key transit center [...]

  2. [...] elsewhere in Central Asia could further limit the supply of water in an already stressed region. As we noted previously: [the] headwaters of many of the area’s transboundary rivers, which relate to no less than eight [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,526 other followers

%d bloggers like this: