The difference between data and practical data can be vast – and can mean the difference between lives lost and lives saved. Indeed, a lot of the data that is used, analyzed and discussed in the academic research worlds rarely finds its way to either policy-makers or practitioners. And if it does, it is often misunderstood, not understood at all, or met with ambivalence. That’s why effective data presentation is so important – especially in the context of increased climate-related risks. But access to raw data sets is also important, as it gives different institutions (and people) with different mandates, missions and needs the flexibility to utilize and interpret data in a way that is most useful for advancing their work, or meeting their specific needs. A few recent articles tackle these two separate but interrelated issues.
In a piece titled “Can Data Visualizations Help Mediate Between the Worlds of Research, Policy and Practice?” Justin DeShazor makes a ringing appeal for better data visualization, stating: “Constructing maps, charts, and graphics should be an important component in building a common language for substantive dialogue between policymakers and scholars. We should do more of it!” On the other hand, Joshua Howgego of SciDev.net reports on the need for institutions to open up access to raw data. He notes: ‘Governments are “shooting themselves in the foot” by not opening up their geospatial data, an official from the US National Academy of Sciences recently told SciDev.Net. Such data could be useful for development projects and policy, including city planning and producing disaster preparedness maps…’
Back in 2011, we also wrote a piece on the subject of data presentation, noting that those who do it best should be lauded as life-savers and heroes. It also gave us a decent excuse to highlight our favorite example of data presentation “Mapping Napoleon’s March.” We’ve pasted it in full below.
Data Presenters Can Be Heroes Too: Mapping Climate and Disaster Risk
By Francesco Femia and Caitlin Werrell
October 17, 2011
One of the most famous examples of effective statistical data presentation is Charles Joseph Minard’s “Mapping Napoleon’s March.” The chart (below) details the geographical progression of Napoleon Bonaparte’s Russian campaign of 1812, and powerfully communicates to the reader the scale of lives lost over time, space and temperature. The effect is clear. The data, presented in such a way, fully demonstrates how disastrous the campaign was, and how closely that devastation was linked to cold weather. It has taken many an author entire books to get the same point across.
Over the last century we have made leaps and bounds in our technological capacity to collect data, but have had less success with presenting it to people who could use it. Let’s take the example of climate data and disaster risk management. Practitioners that are responsible for preventing and responding to disasters often have difficulty using climate data in their work, not necessarily because the data isn’t complete (though it sometimes is), but because it is often times not presented in a way that makes it easy to understand or use, particularly given the local, regional and institutional contexts disaster risk managers are operating in. This failure of communication could mean the difference between lives and deaths.
A recent report from the International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) demonstrates this critical point, among other issues, and highlights a number of solutions. As stated on page 20:
In some cases, disaster risk managers may…decide not to incorporate climate information into their decision-making process even if it is available….disaster managers have historically been exposed to an often-daunting mass of largely unfiltered, irrelevant and even conflicting information.
The tragedy of available information not being used to help prepare for disaster, due to the fact that it is not well-organized or well-contextualized, is enormous. It’s the equivalent of a doctor handing a patient reams of x-rays and blood test reference range charts that indicate the presence of a treatable, yet potentially terminable, disease, and not interpreting them. This would, of course, be completely unacceptable. But in cases of climate-related disasters, hundreds, if not hundreds of thousands, of lives are on the line, and the diagnoses are not being properly communicated. In the case of climate data, the difference is that the “presentation” and “interpretation” of data is a skill that neither climate scientists nor disaster risk managers are necessarily trained for.
But there’s good news. Effective, user-friendly data presentation can certainly be done, and there exist people and institutions with the ability to do it.
One way of making climate data useful for disaster risk practitioners are IRI’s “global skills maps (see pg 39).” These maps are different from many other climate data presentations because they strip climate information down to their relevant parts only. For disaster risk practitioners, some of the most relevant information is the certainty and uncertainty of seasonal weather forecasts, and these skill maps provide just that. As stated in the report (in reference to the image below):
Skill maps provide a quick indication of where seasonal forecasts can be used for early warning…Figure B3 based on IRI’s forecasts since 1997, indicates areas where seasonal forecasts may rarely (‘little or no skill’), sometimes (‘some skill’), or often (‘good skill’) provide useful information about rainfall for the next three months. Based on this information, disaster risk managers can decide whether or not seasonal forecasts are worth monitoring. For instance, in places where there is little to no skill, any shift in the probabilities is likely to be small and early warning opportunities will thus be very limited.
Producing and improving upon these sorts of solutions should be the focus of people, NGOs and governments that are serious about managing disaster and climate risk. In seeking to utilize climate information to inform our decisions, particularly those involving the prevention of catastrophic events, we should look to Charles Joseph Minard for inspiration. His famous chart of Napoleon’s calamitous march has been called the “best statistical graphic ever drawn,” which “defies the pen of the historian in its brutal eloquence.”
If such expert attention can be lavished on the dubious exploits of a maladjusted emperor from the 19th century, surely those that are vulnerable to future climate-related disasters deserve at least the same level of attention?
Indeed, expert “data presenters” could very well become the heroes of a climate-uncertain future.