Site icon The Center for Climate & Security

Climate Security at the UNSC: Opportunities for US Action in March

Caitlin Werrell, Co-Founder and President of the Center for Climate and Security, presents the Responsibility to Prepare framework to the UN Security Council – Dec 15, 2017

By Erin Sikorsky, Steve Brock, Francesco Femia, Rachel Fleishman, and Caitlin Werrell

“No one country can solve the climate crisis on its own. It’s exactly the kind of challenge the United Nations was created to solve.” – U.S. Special Envoy John Kerry, UNSC High Level Meeting on Climate Security

On February 23, the UK capped off its February Presidency of the UN Security Council (UNSC) by hosting a high-level meeting on climate security, chaired by Prime Minister Boris Johnson. At the meeting, Johnson noted, “it is absolutely clear that climate change is a threat to our collective security and the security of our nations….climate change is a geopolitical issue every bit as much as it is an environmental one. And if this Council is going to succeed in maintaining peace and security worldwide then it’s got to galvanise the whole range of UN agencies and organisations into a swift and effective response.” 

What might such a swift and effective response look like? As the United States assumes the UNSC Presidency in March, it has an opportunity to turn the speeches at the UK-led meeting into lasting action. The Presidency will be Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield’s first chance to advance President Biden’s repeated pledges to put climate change at the center of U.S. foreign policy. Possible activities the US could consider, in support of its broader whole-of-government strategy as outlined in the Executive Order on the climate crisis, are the following: 

While the UNSC Presidency provides an opportunity to shine the spotlight on climate security, there are additional steps the US and its allies and partners can advance to integrate climate security into UN institutions and processes. These are longer-term actions, and will require sustained commitment and coalition building to enact. As outlined in a previous Council on Strategic Risks blog post, there is currently an appetite for such transformational action among many current UNSC members. Recommendations in this realm draw from the Center for Climate and Security’s Responsibility to Prepare and Prevent framework, and include:

While a climate security framework will be easily accepted by   some UN actors, it may be met with skepticism by others. The US should therefore seek to work closely with other UN member states to help generate broad support. This support will be especially critical in the UN General Assembly’s Fifth Committee which has authority over budget and management issues.  Addressing climate security successfully will require the same level of discipline and rigor as are afforded other critical security issues, including full integration into training, education, situational assessments, planning and operations. 

Action on climate security at the UN should be just one aspect of a broader US climate security strategy. It is an important aspect, however, particularly given President Biden’s commitment to centering the issue across US foreign, development and security policy. Institutionalizing analysis and consideration of climate security risks throughout the UN will help the organization meet its mission to maintain international peace and security.

Exit mobile version