Site icon The Center for Climate & Security

A Climate Security Plan for America Part 1: Demonstrate Leadership

By John Conger

Part 1 of 4 in the Climate Security Plan for America Blog Series

In late 2019, the Center for Climate and Security-led Climate Security Advisory Group, a group of senior U.S. national security and military experts, including eight retired four-star generals and admirals, published the A Climate Security Plan for America.  These leaders outlined a comprehensive plan to elevate climate change as a security priority and offered recommendations in four broad categories.  This blog discusses the first, Demonstrating Leadership.

As we stated in the report, we believed that in order to successfully counter climate security challenges, it must be an articulated priority of the U.S. President.  Check.  President-elect Biden has repeated often that he seeks to make climate change “a core national security priority.”  He named former Secretary Kerry as his “climate envoy” with a seat on the National Security Council.  For his own part, Secretary Kerry’s initial comments on his new role have focused on the security threat posed by climate change. 

We also stated that climate impacts must be integrated into the security considerations of multiple federal agencies, not as an isolated issue, but as “a risk that informs and affects the security priorities with which these agencies wrestle on a daily basis.”  In other words, asking if climate change is a bigger threat than traditional security priorities is the wrong question.  Instead, ask how climate change affects the behavior of peer competitors or rogue nations, how it affects global stability, or the capability and capacity of our own military forces. 

When we advocated for leadership, we called on the Administration to “make climate change a vital national security priority.” Key recommendations included:

So far so good.  The new Administration looks like it is on track with our first three recommendations.  The next set focused on personnel.

Especially at this stage in an administration, personnel choices reflect policy preferences.  The priorities of these leaders will, of course, reflect those of the President, but their views will color the way they execute those priorities.  These will be the people that execute the President’s climate vision, and policy progress will move slowly if federal agency leaders don’t buy into it.

Finally, we included recommendations that the President should show international leadership.  Specifically, we recommended that he:

President-elect Biden has clearly sent important signals, indicating that he will not only rejoin the Paris Agreement, but call for increased commitments in emissions reductions that go beyond the commitments in that document.  Interestingly, our signatories recognized the vital importance of voluntary emissions reductions to avoid future security consequences, but thought the most significant goal of rejoining the Paris Agreement would be to reclaim its international leadership position.  Leaving the Paris Agreement has diminished U.S. influence globally, exacting a cost in international stature for no gain.

It is clear that President-Elect Biden has met, or is on track to meet, many of the recommendations we outlined, but for him to truly “Make Climate Change a Vital National Security Priority”, there is a lot of hard work yet to come.

Exit mobile version